The Seybold Report

The Newsletter Read by Graphic Arts Professionals Worldwide

Page 4 of 8

Class Action Lawsuit Alleges Intel Sold Billions of Defective CPUs with Security Flaws, Performance Issues, and More

A proposed class action lawsuit alleges Intel Corporation has for years knowingly sold billions of central processing units (CPUs) plagued with a design defect that leaves the chips “egregiously” vulnerable to cyberattacks—and its only “fix” can slow computer performance by as much as 50%.

The 112-page lawsuit, filed in the Northern District of California on November 8, 2023, says the design flaws present in Intel’s 6th through 11th generation of CPUs—which drive “billions of computers throughout the world”—can be easily exploited to steal sensitive data stored in a computer system’s memory, such as passwords or encryption keys.

Our Take: this information comes from ClassAction.org, a non-profit which publishes a free newsletter on legal actions, class actions lawsuits, and eye-popping corporate malfeasance stories.

To learn more about this particular story which could potentially affect millions of people, please visit https://www.classaction.org/blog/class-action-alleges-intel-sold-billions-of-defective-cpus-with-security-flaws-performance-issues.

Our thanks to Slejven Djurakovic on Unsplash for providing the featured image on this post.

Google and Meta Could Owe United States Publishers Billions of Dollars

According to a working paper published in November by the Poynter Institute, Google and Meta could owe publishers in the United States billions of dollars. This finding would not be a surprise to any publisher who has worked in the industry since the two companies spun out their first websites. If your company does any kind of publishing on the Web, this is a must-read document.

Here is how the Executive Summary of the 46-page paper replete with footnotes, charts, and graphs get the presentation underway, “This paper estimates the payment that Facebook and Google Search platforms would owe to news publishers for the use of news content, if the Journalism Competition & Preservation Act (JCPA) comes into force. Existing deals made between these platforms and news publishers do not capture the full value generated by news content on the platforms. Using game theoretical insights into cooperative bargaining in cases where there is jointly-created value, we find a compelling case for a large payment from platforms to news publishers.”

“Our contributions are not only that we provide a dollar amount for what is owed – which we estimate at between US$11.9 billion and US$13.9 billion a year in the United States – but also that we detail our methodology to enable others to replicate our work or use our approach to calculate a ‘fair payment’ to publishers in other markets. We benchmark our estimates against recent agreements between news outlets and Google and Meta (previously known as Facebook), as well as with a database of licensing agreements made over recent decades for similar content-based products.”

Key Findings

  • Using game theoretical insights into cooperative bargaining in cases where value is jointly created, we find a compelling case for a large payment from platforms to news publishers.
  • We first estimate (using a conservative assumption), that Facebook owes US$1.9 billion to US publishers annually for use of their content on its platform.
  • We estimate that US$10–12 billion is owed by Google to US news publishers annually.
  • Using existing platform-publisher agreements around the world as a benchmark, we find that a fair revenue split would give news publishers 50% of news-related revenue earned by Google and Facebook.
  • We document that Google and Facebook are making payments to publishers around the world that are vastly below our estimates of a “fair payment”.

The Joss Group is on Instagram!

Please read, share, and follow: the Joss Group has an Instagram account! There we post examples of recent design work, creative fodder, blog post notices, and once in a while, images of Seybold Report covers from years past.

It’s different, and we try to keep it interesting.

Click here to see us on Instagram.

The Future of Online Publishing?

Please, please tell us this recent LinkedIn post* is not indicative of the future of online publishing, digital publishing, or (indeed) publishing in general. If it is, it is not just the “guy down the street” who is going to suffer. If it is, we are all going to be buried under a mass of auto-generated vapid content, at best, and more likely, an avalanche of useless, error-ridden poppycock.

linkedin post

*We erased the LinkedIn’s user’s profile information and also part of the URL that might have indicated something about their identity. We wish to point out a potential problem–not shame any individuals.

It’s Banned Book Week: Read Banned Books and Join Protests

October 1-7 is Banned Books Week. A coalition of organizations dedicated to free expression support this important effort to bring attention to attempts to ban books and repress freedom of the press.

The group includes American Booksellers for Free Expression, American Library Association, American Society of Journalists and Authors, Amnesty International USA, Association of University Presses, Authors Guild, Banned Books Week Sweden, Children’s Book Council, Comic Book Legal Defense Fund, Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, Freedom to Read Foundation, GLAAD, Index on Censorship, Little Free Library, National Book Foundation, National Coalition Against Censorship, National Council of Teachers of English, PEN America, People For the American Way Foundation, PFLAG, and Project Censored. It is endorsed by the Center for the Book in the Library of Congress. Banned Books Week also receives generous support from HarperCollins Publishers and Penguin Random House.

This year LeVar Burton is the honorary chair. Burton has a long track record of advocating for books, publishing, and reading. In his statement for this year’s event he says, “Books bring us together. They teach us about the world and each other. The ability to read and access books is a fundamental right and a necessity for life-long success.”

He adds, “But books are under attack. They’re being removed from libraries and schools. Shelves have been emptied because of a small number of people and their misguided efforts toward censorship. Public advocacy campaigns like Banned Books Week are essential to helping people understand the scope of book censorship and what they can do to fight it. I’m honored to lead Banned Books Week 2023.”

Saturday, October 7, is Let Freedom Read Day, a day of action against censorship. You can take part: do at least one thing this week to defend the right to read and to speak on behalf of those who ensure access to information. And, of course, you could always buy and read or check-out and read (you have a library card, right?) one of the books the ALA reports people are challenging (asking them to remove); have a chat with a librarian or bookseller for recommendations. For information about ways to participate and resources, visit bannedbooksweek.org/let-freedom-read-day/. And, here’s more inspiration.

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2025 The Seybold Report

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑